Search for: "Childs F. Burden"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
The question was whether an Arizona child molestation statute properly placed the burden of proving no sexual motive on the defendant as an affirmative defense rather than requiring the government to prove a sexual motive as part of its case against the defendant. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
, 2 F.3d 322 (U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:40 am
Rath, 718 F. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
Rath, 718 F. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:44 am
Groenendal, 557 F.3d 419 (6th Cir. 2009) ("penetration of a pre-pubescent child by an adult male constitutes inherently sadistic conduct") because an 11- or 12-year-old child is not necessarily pre-pubescent. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:37 am
Casey Reaffirmed Roe and Established Undue Burden Standard appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 1:48 pm
Nolan, 818 F.2d 1015 (1st Cir. 1987), holding that such expert opinion testimony -- that a photographic image is of a real child -- is not required to meet the government's burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
As with all sentencing enhancements, the prosecution has the burden of proving § 2G2.2(b)(3)(B)'s applicability by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
The Appellate Division in Cantelme (f/k/a) Archetti v. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 8:03 am
Furthermore, Section 16.93(1) stipulates that the parent who intends to relocate the child or children has the burden of proving that the relocation will be in the child’s best interests. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 8:03 am
Furthermore, Section 16.93(1) stipulates that the parent who intends to relocate the child or children has the burden of proving that the relocation will be in the child’s best interests. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 8:03 am
Furthermore, Section 16.93(1) stipulates that the parent who intends to relocate the child or children has the burden of proving that the relocation will be in the child’s best interests. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 8:03 am
Furthermore, Section 16.93(1) stipulates that the parent who intends to relocate the child or children has the burden of proving that the relocation will be in the child’s best interests. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 3:00 am
Once this burden is met, the burden shifts to the defendant. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:57 am
After a bench trial the Court found Respondent had failed to meet her burden to show that the mature child exception applied. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Michael F. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Michael F. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
Lowe, 795 F.3d 519 (U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
"A misapplication of the burden of proof is reversible error (see M.M. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
Moran, 612 F.3d 684, 690 (8th Cir. 2010).The only issue for the jury was whether McCoy knowingly possessed child pornography. [read post]
